To request published papers, enter your e-mail address in the box below, then click on the "Request" button of the paper you wish to recieve. A reprint of the article will be e-mailed to you shortly.
Your e-mail address:   

	Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (In press). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods.
	Meade, A. W., & Wright, N. A. (In press). Solving the measurement invariance anchor item problem in item response theory. Journal of Applied Psychology.
	Hoffman, B. J., & Meade, A. W. (2012). Alternate approaches to understanding the psychometric properties of assessment centers: An analysis of the structure and equivalence of exercise ratings. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20, 82-97.
	Wright, N. A., & Meade, A. W. (2012). An exploration of cognitive ability contamination in the implicit association test. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 393-399.
	Behrend, T. S., Sharek, D. S., Meade, A. W., & Wiebe, E. N. (2011). The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 800-813.
	Goldsworthy, R. C., Mayhorn, C. B., & Meade, A. W. (2010). Warnings in manufacturing: Improving hazard mitigation messaging through audience analysis. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing and Service Industries, 20, 484-499.
	Meade, A. W. (2010). A taxonomy of effect size measures for the differential functioning of items and scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 728-743.
	Meade, A. W. & Tonidandel, S. (2010). Not seeing clearly with Cleary: What test bias analyses do and do not tell us. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 3, 192-205.
	Braddy, P. W., Meade, A. W., Michael, J. J., & Fleenor, J. W. (2009). Internet recruiting: Effects of website content features on viewers’ perceptions of organizational culture. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17, 19-34.
	Johnson, E. C., Meade, A. W., & DuVernet, A. M. (2009). The role of referent indicators in tests of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 642-657.
	Meade, A. W., & Fetzer, M. (2009). Test bias, differential prediction, and a revised approach for determining the suitability of a predictor in a selection context. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 738-761.
	Rivers, D., Meade, A. W., & Fuller, W. L. (2009). Examining question and context effects in organization survey data using item response theory. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 529-553.
	Baranik, L. E., Meade, A. W., Lakey, C. E., Lance, C. E., Hu, C., Hua, W., & Michalos, A. (2008). Examining differential item functioning of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale across eight countries. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 1867-1904.
	Behrend, T. S., Thompson, L. F., Meade, A. W., Grayson, M. S., & Newton, D. A. (2008). Measurement invariance in careers research: using IRT to study gender differences in medical students’ specialization decisions. Journal of Career Development, 35, 60-83.
	Braddy, P. W., Meade, A. W., & Kroustalis, C. M. (2008). Online recruiting: The effects of organizational familiarity, website usability, and website attractiveness on viewers’ impressions of organizations. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2992-3001.
	Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C., & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 568-592.
	Baker, B. A., Caison, A. L., & Meade, A. W. (2007). Assessing gender-related differential item functioning and predictive validity with the Institutional Integration Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 545-559.
	Lance, C. E., Woehr, D. J., & Meade, A. W. (2007). Case study: A Monte Carlo investigation of assessment center construct validity models. Organizational Research Methods, 10, 430-448.
	Meade, A. W., & Bauer, D. J. (2007). Power and precision in confirmatory factor analytic tests of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 611-635.
	Meade, A. W., & Eby, L. T. (2007). Using indices of group agreement in multilevel construct validation. Organizational Research Methods, 10, 75-96.
	Meade, A. W., Lautenschlager, G. J., & Johnson, E. C. (2007). A Monte-Carlo examination of the sensitivity of the DFIT framework for tests of measurement invariance with Likert data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 430-455.
	Meade, A. W., Michels, L. C., & Lautenschlager, G. J. (2007). Are internet and paper-and-pencil personality tests truly comparable? An experimental design measurement invariance study. Organizational Research Methods, 10, 322-345.
	Braddy, P. W., Meade, A. W., & Kroustalis, C. M. (2006). Organizational recruitment website effects on viewers’ perceptions of organizational culture. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20, 525-543.
	Meade, A. W., & Kroustalis, C. M. (2006). Problems with item parceling for confirmatory factor analytic tests of measurement invariance. Organizational Research Methods, 9, 369-403.
	Meade, A. W., & Lautenschlager, G. J., & Hecht, J. E. (2005). Establishing measurement equivalence/invariance in longitudinal data with item response theory. International Journal of Testing, 5, 279-300.
	Meade, A. W. (2004). Psychometric problems and issues involved with creating and using ipsative measures for selection. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 531-552.
	Meade, A. W., & Lautenschlager, G. J. (2004). A comparison of item response theory and confirmatory factor analytic methodologies for establishing measurement equivalence/invariance. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 361-388.
	Meade, A. W., & Lautenschlager, G. J. (2004). A Monte-Carlo study of confirmatory factor analytic tests of measurement equivalence/invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 60-72.
	Eby, L. T., Meade, A. W., Douthitt, S., & Parisi, T. (1999). The development of an individual-level teamwork expectations measure and the application of a within-group agreement statistic to assess shared expectations for teamwork. Organizational Research Methods, 2, 366-394.

PLEASE NOTE: Journal article PDF files are available for one-time personal use only.  Any further distribution, publication, or commercial use of this copyrighted material requires publisher permission.